ATWOOD | CHERNY
  • HOME
  • ATTORNEYS
    • ALL ATTORNEYS >
      • David E. Cherny
      • Erin M. Shapiro
      • Mary Beth L. Sweeney
      • Dawn Ethier Young
      • Rachael M. Soun
      • Gretel Marie DuFresne
      • Cassandra K. Lampron
      • Simone D. Shapiro
      • Kristen A Klinetob
      • Alanna E. Mahnke
      • Joseph W. DeCaro
      • Nicole Eidelman
      • Paige M. Medeiros
      • Jason L. Land
      • Mark T. Smith
    • IN MEMORY | Jacob M. Atwood
    • AWARDS
  • SERVICES
  • SIGNIFICANT CASES
    • ALL SIGNIFICANT CASES
    • A.D. v. K.S.
    • Rodman v. Rodman
    • Young v. Young
    • Van Arsdale v. Van Arsdale
    • Zaleski v. Zaleski
    • ​Vedensky v. ​Vedensky
    • Pierce v. Pierce
    • Austin v. Austin
    • Sbrogna v. Sbrogna
    • Scwartz v. Schwartz
    • Braun v. Braun
    • Hennessey v. Sarkis
    • DeMatteo v. DeMatteo
    • E.N.O. v. L.M.M.
    • Krock v. Krock
    • Cricenti v. Weiland
    • Kendall v. Kendall
    • Rosenberg v. Rosenberg
    • Bacon v. Bacon
    • Wansong v. Wansong
    • Dominick v. Dominick
    • Rolde v. Rolde
    • Osborne v. Osborne
  • CONTACT & DIRECTIONS
    • All Contacts & Directions >
      • General Email
      • david E. cherny contact page
      • erin m. shapiro contact page
      • mary beth L. sweeney contact page
      • dawn ethIer young contact page
      • rachael m. soun contact page
      • gretel m. dufresne contact page
      • Cassandra K. Lampron contact page
      • Simone D. Shapiro contact page
      • Kristen A. Klinetob contact page
      • Alanna E. Mahnke contact page
      • Joseph W. DeCaro contact page
      • Nicole Eidelman contact page
      • Paige M. Medeiros contact page
      • Jason L. Land contact page
      • Mark T. Smith contact page
Cricenti v. Weiland, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 785 (1998)
​The wife was a resident of Massachusetts and the husband was a resident of New Hampshire. The parties entered into an agreement modifying a divorce judgment, allowing the wife to move with the parties' minor children from Massachusetts to Nebraska. As part of the agreement, the parties agreed that Massachusetts would retain exclusive jurisdiction over the custody and visitation issues of the children. Approximately 1-1/2 years later, the Wife filed a petition in Nebraska to modify the terms of visitation. The Massachusetts court enjoined the wife from proceeding in Nebraska. The court also denied the wife's motion to dismiss based on the court's lack of jurisdiction under the Massachusetts Child Custody Jurisdiction Act and the Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act. On appeal, the Massachusetts Appeals Court reversed the lower court, holding that in interstate custody disputes under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act and the Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act, Massachusetts does not reserve jurisdiction under a continuing exclusive jurisdiction provision.
READ MORE ABOUT THIS CASE  >
BACK TO all SIGNIFICANT CASES >

ATWOOD | CHERNY  PC
617-262-6400  |  Fax:  617-421-9482  |  [email protected]
​>> Our New Main Address As Of August 27, 2025
NEWTON > Main Office: 199 Wells Avenue, Suite 211, Newton, MA 02459  USA  
ANDOVER > Satellite Office: 15 Chestnut Street, Andover, MA 01810  USA
​NORTHBOROUGH > Satellite Office: 9 Monroe Street, Northborough, MA 01532  USA

Vertical Divider
CONTACT ATWOOD & CHERNY >
The material presented on this site is included with the understanding and agreement that Atwood & Cherny, P.C., is not engaged in rendering legal or other professional services by posting such material. The services of a competent professional should be sought if legal or other specific expert assistance is required.  Copyright 2025
  • HOME
  • ATTORNEYS
    • ALL ATTORNEYS >
      • David E. Cherny
      • Erin M. Shapiro
      • Mary Beth L. Sweeney
      • Dawn Ethier Young
      • Rachael M. Soun
      • Gretel Marie DuFresne
      • Cassandra K. Lampron
      • Simone D. Shapiro
      • Kristen A Klinetob
      • Alanna E. Mahnke
      • Joseph W. DeCaro
      • Nicole Eidelman
      • Paige M. Medeiros
      • Jason L. Land
      • Mark T. Smith
    • IN MEMORY | Jacob M. Atwood
    • AWARDS
  • SERVICES
  • SIGNIFICANT CASES
    • ALL SIGNIFICANT CASES
    • A.D. v. K.S.
    • Rodman v. Rodman
    • Young v. Young
    • Van Arsdale v. Van Arsdale
    • Zaleski v. Zaleski
    • ​Vedensky v. ​Vedensky
    • Pierce v. Pierce
    • Austin v. Austin
    • Sbrogna v. Sbrogna
    • Scwartz v. Schwartz
    • Braun v. Braun
    • Hennessey v. Sarkis
    • DeMatteo v. DeMatteo
    • E.N.O. v. L.M.M.
    • Krock v. Krock
    • Cricenti v. Weiland
    • Kendall v. Kendall
    • Rosenberg v. Rosenberg
    • Bacon v. Bacon
    • Wansong v. Wansong
    • Dominick v. Dominick
    • Rolde v. Rolde
    • Osborne v. Osborne
  • CONTACT & DIRECTIONS
    • All Contacts & Directions >
      • General Email
      • david E. cherny contact page
      • erin m. shapiro contact page
      • mary beth L. sweeney contact page
      • dawn ethIer young contact page
      • rachael m. soun contact page
      • gretel m. dufresne contact page
      • Cassandra K. Lampron contact page
      • Simone D. Shapiro contact page
      • Kristen A. Klinetob contact page
      • Alanna E. Mahnke contact page
      • Joseph W. DeCaro contact page
      • Nicole Eidelman contact page
      • Paige M. Medeiros contact page
      • Jason L. Land contact page
      • Mark T. Smith contact page